New EU Sanctions: What Changes for the Lukashenko Regime
- Admin of the NAM
- Apr 24
- 6 min read
Spring 2026 has become a moment of truth for the Lukashenko regime. While official statistics attempt to save face, external pressure is entering a new phase. The 20th EU sanctions package, adopted on 23 April, is yet another step toward eliminating the "Belarusian offshore" that for years helped the Kremlin circumvent Western barriers. Before analysing the new sanctions, it is worth examining the economic context in which Belarus and Russia already find themselves.
The head of Swedish military intelligence, Thomas Nilsson, stated directly in an interview with the Financial Times: the Kremlin is systematically manipulating figures. According to Swedish intelligence, Russia is understating its budget deficit by $30 billion. The official inflation rate of 5.86% is far below the real rate of 15%. Russia's economy is "living on credit" and is heading either toward a long-term decline or a sharp shock.
For the Lukashenko regime, this is a warning signal: the "big brother," who is the main donor and market, is concealing the depth of its financial hole. If the Russian economy follows the "shock" scenario, the consequences for the Lukashenko regime will be avalanche-like.
Data for the first quarter of 2026 paint a picture of a crisis economy in Belarus, where consumption is growing while production and investment are falling. Enormous warehouse stocks indicate that enterprises are operating at a loss to maintain employment, but their output finds no market. This is a "time bomb" for the financial stability of the system.
Despite the efforts of lobbyists, the new EU sanctions package against the Lukashenko regime once again extended their validity until 28 February 2027. This is a signal that the "thaw" the Lukashenko regime had been counting on will not come. Investments will not arrive, borders will not open, assets will remain frozen. This encourages internal sabotage among those officials who still hoped to "wait it out.For the Kremlin, the value of Belarus as a "logistics hub" and "window to Europe and the world" is rapidly declining. If diamonds, computers, and spare parts can no longer be transported through Belarus, and its enterprises fall under sanctions alongside Russian ones, then it turns into a costly liability that simply needs to be maintained.This package, like several preceding ones, is aimed primarily at harmonising restrictions against the Lukashenko regime and Russia. The main goal is to make it impossible to use Belarus as a loophole for the Kremlin to circumvent sanctions.
Harmonisation has affected a wide range of goods: bans have been imposed on certain types of raw materials, metals, minerals, steel scrap, chemicals, vulcanised rubber products, tanned furs, metal production tools, and industrial tractors, and import quotas on ammonia have been introduced. All these measures will be supplemented by tightened bans on transit through Russian territory. The list of goods prohibited from transit through Belarus has also been expanded.
From 25 May of this year, the provision of cybersecurity services to Belarusian state bodies is prohibited. This is a blow to the technological development of the Lukashenko regime, which is building a "digital GULAG" in Belarus. The EU has also blocked the use of the "Belarusian digital ruble" before its official launch, planned for the second half of 2026. This system had not yet been fully launched but was considered a potential instrument for circumventing sanctions. This is a rare case where sanctions are directed not at an existing problem but at a future one. The regime is being deprived of the ability to create a new channel for circumventing restrictions before it even comes into existence.
Any transactions through Belarusian crypto platforms have also been banned. These measures are aimed at preventing the regime from using digital payment systems to circumvent existing restrictions. This will significantly complicate settlements serving "shadow" operations to bypass sanctions.
A strict traceability mechanism for trade in Russian diamonds has also been introduced. Importers in the EU must now prove that the stones are not of Russian origin. This measure closes the scheme of their resale through Belarus. As far back as 20 November 2023, the NAM had reported on the threat of circumventing sanctions against Russia's diamond industry via Belarus and had transmitted this data to the European Commission. A report on this matter was also published on 23 November 2023 in the major European outlet European Interest Media.
In the new sanctions package, for the first time a Chinese state organisation has come under sanctions — one linked to the production of military equipment in Belarus through the joint venture "Volat-Sanziang". This is a clear signal from the European Union to Beijing: cooperation with Lukashenko in the military sphere is toxic and will have negative consequences. Thus, cooperation with the Belarusian military-industrial complex may have consequences not only for Russia but also for its partners. Overall, the toxicity of any projects linked to Belarus's military industry is sharply increasing, making them less attractive even for those who were previously willing to operate in the grey zone.
Also on the EU sanctions list is the Belarusian Oil Company (BOC), which strikes at one of the key sources of foreign currency revenue for the Lukashenko regime — petroleum products. Every operation for the company now becomes more difficult: banks are more cautious, partners demand additional guarantees, settlements take longer and cost more. As a result, the regime is forced to sell its products at greater discounts or through non-transparent schemes. In other words, exports partially remain but their efficiency declines.
The European Union, in its new sanctions decisions, has moved toward radical measures against re-export through third countries. In particular, the export of computers and radio stations from the EU to Kyrgyzstan has been banned due to the risk of them ending up in Russia or Belarus. This is an unprecedented precedent: the EU is imposing trade sanctions against an entire country caught facilitating the circumvention of existing restrictions.
The new package also introduces a measure whereby sanctions can now be imposed on individuals and legal entities from any country if they assist in supplying prohibited goods to Belarus. This changes the rules of the game. If previously partners could count on a certain distance — arguing that they were not directly under sanctions — that distance no longer exists. Every transaction becomes a potential risk. Foreign counterparties will also no longer be able to claim compensation for failure to fulfil contracts if this is caused by sanctions.
In the 20th sanctions package against Russia, a ban on liquefied gas terminal transshipment services has been introduced, which will come into force in 2027, reducing the overall revenues of the aggressors. Furthermore, in the new anti-Russian sanctions, the broadcasting ban has been extended to "mirror" structures that duplicate the content of sanctioned channels. This may also affect Belarusian platforms if they are used to broadcast Russian content banned by the EU. This is yet another blow to the propaganda of the Union State of Russia and Belarus.
The 20th package is the result of systematic lobbying. Measures on sanctions against third countries, trade quotas, and transit restrictions had been consistently proposed by the NAM for implementation in 2023–2025. The European Union had until recently refused to adopt such radical measures. But now this is already a reality.
Thus, the European Union is not striking at individual enterprises or individual sectors. It is striking at the very model upon which the regime's adaptation to sanctions was built. This means fewer opportunities for manoeuvre, greater risks for partners, higher costs for every operation, and the gradual narrowing of space for economic activity. This is precisely why the effect of this package will not be immediate but cumulative. With each new restriction, the system does not collapse, but becomes ever more burdensome, costly, and dependent. And this is, perhaps, the main result.
At least until February 2027, the Lukashenko regime will remain in a state of resource exhaustion. The growth of real household incomes against the backdrop of falling production looks like a "feast during the plague," which will inevitably end in the financial crisis that European intelligence services are warning about. The Lukashenko regime must stop playing at aggression and dictatorship and embark on the path of democratic transition — otherwise it may be too late.
Comments